VALE DO NOT COMPLAIN AFTER
Yesterday I received a phone call from a friend who recommended me to read the report Merco 2010 on the classification of English cities over 100,000 inhabitants. I got them and I must confess that I have created a sense of anger and disappointment.
clarify that Merco (Corporate Reputation Monitor) is an assessment tool based on university research that is done from the chair of Professor Villafañe at the Complutense University of Madrid and is materialized through the agreement between Villafañe & Asociados, the Vocento and Analysis and Research. Also in this last October 2010 study sampling was carried out on 9100 people from cities over 100,000 inhabitants. There seems to be de rigueur.
Well in this ranking of cities, leaving very bad off Getafe, at number 73 after falling in just two years from 36, ie 37 positions. Referring to the community of Madrid is the penultimate, overcome by all the cities least Parla.
I wonder why the citizens who have entrusted permanently in the Socialist Party no Getafe keep sending messages of disappointment. Each time you see a survey, a questionnaire, a sociological study ... do not trust, do not approve and transmit their "infidelity" to the PSOE.
think it is true that everything in life is black or white is a mistake. True, there are reasons beyond that would be unfair to charge the local government. Not to blame for a global economic crisis to date is being carried forward to all governments that have had to deal are the sign they are, and those not yet touched them go to the polls have the highest rates low popularity of the story. The brand is the brand and Zapatero not help in this case to Pedro Castro. Nor does it help to have started a Parliament before the middle of this for different reasons Abondano the corporation has the number 1, 2 and 5 of the opposition party and the numbers 3, the government parties, it is not edifying for the voter this situation. It does not help the consideration that people have of politicians who think that hurts more longest in public office.
But if I think the public is disenchanted to see that an ambitious agenda for the future has a very low rate of implementation. Not be restrained in expression and commitments to be fulfilled. Conveying a permanent chicken-fight in the various groups of the corporation. To be judged harshly and lassitude unlike himself for the same reasons. That is still not able to explain how little or much that is beyond the self hype rigor. That there is a sense of lawlessness, which is not worth it today tomorrow. The abuse especially in times of crisis of trust charges. That government is government today and tomorrow ... etc groups disagree.
legislature at this point it seems the whole "pescao" is sold out. I think not. And much less if it appears that voting trends are equal to the parties that can govern. I remember that 22 or 23 percent of undecided voters can throw three or four councilmen, and sociologists say that they know our city that are heard in the campaign a couple of councilors. The question is: What should I do to turn the tide of disaffection the local government to show the public every time you ask? I say government I mean the PSOE, because like it or not, IU only govern if you do the PSOE. The only sports games that get played the final and absolute respect for all voters, the final play the PP and PSOE.
It is not easy to answer the question and also it would seem pretentious one. But for what it is allowing me some ideas.
.- The situation is different from previous elections. So not worth the same proposals.
.- Bridging the earliest to focus on domestic problems that affect the city and its citizens is of vital importance.
modest .- Offer solutions from Getafe to work with community and state issues. Unemployment, education, transport ...
.- Explain that you want to flee the city desires and arrogance and clinging to the socio economic climate.
.- Mark clearly programmatic differences, ideological and pragmatic government with partners to prevent dilution of a few hundred votes in the end give or take away a councilman.
.- Redisplay the campaign that you think about the future of the city and enb the welfare of the citizenry over the need to govern from the opposition.
.- loudly and clearly explain that remains to be done than not done and since this time if possible.
.- now broadcast in the campaign. We are in the century XXI, powerful tools are among the new technologies that are sure to come over and like the citizens over the streets and acts faithful minions.
And still I do not want to leave me a decalogue and because they simply are responsible for the campaign with professional advisors, I hope, those who have to decide. "Certainly someone could clarify whether a professional job in the last elections in USA, in a management position, is working for education of Getafe? Personally I do not seem quite the opposite criticism.
In order then that is not that what we were suggesting to voters.
There is still time.
Take care.