After over 30 years of Democracy, in addition to reviewing the Constitution would not evil that we revise some taboo years ago we set ourselves.
From umbrella POLITICALLY CORRECT not cuetionaba , despite being in Democracy, the work of the judiciary, assuming its independence . The work of the means of communication on behalf of freedom of expression. La Casa Real as essential pillar of the system. Even the coup d'état to Republic legitimate.
Given the events of last country mind, you will allow me consider it POLITICALLY CORRECT say now is, of course with respect to what each wants, based on independence, freedom of expression and democratic pillar of is each individual, an essential element of the collective decision to give or take power. Ie Democracy.
And so today I want to say the judiciary. Because the judiciary is so likely to be criticized like any other, in a Democracy no one, including judges, are over freedom of expression and especially because it is the only branch of government has no control that of public opinion as I admired says Josep Ramoneda . The judiciary is controlled himself. At least, to hold the stakes of the public. It is amazing the capacity of some members of the judiciary, to mix things up and to transport their citizens, angry sterile discussions making its inability to convict on issues of citizenship , leading us to the great quarrel in which we incur or by decisions taken either by inability to make decisions.
note stunned the infighting of some judges, unable to apply the first condition imposed on those who administer justice, wisdom, reflection and willingness to prevent further damage.
We are accustomed to some political first to create problems and then come to fix them. Well looking at the mess that has gotten the Supreme Court and the Constitution, I think this year the award to firefighter arsonist already has a candidate.
As last few dates said Soledad Gallego-Díaz : "Things have gone so far as the suffering citizens are increasingly tired and irritated by events that they find hardly understandable and so astonished at the evidence of quarrels, grudges and feuds between representatives of the judiciary. " Obviously the citizenship need reassurance and tranquility and both one as the others are too scares, fears and concerns that we are submitting.
In recent cases pending the decision of the Statute of Catalonia and "Garzón case, not to mention those who think anything more than friends. It difficult to understand the strange alliance that has been woven between the ultra right , those who administered the dictatorship and today still in the state apparatus, the right and a very concrete core of the judicial left. addition is the role of government, where there still anti virus Garzón, or where there are fears in defending what was approved in the Catalan and English parliaments, which is proving very disturbing because relying on non-interference between branches, leaves do not see the problem political going to have to deal with domestic consequences and international prestige that goes back to the Spain of charanga and tambourine where the Falange and the ultra right in collusion with some of Judges sit on the bench to Democrats. just 15 days ago in the prestigious New York Times read "Spain needs an honest explanation of his past and not pursue who has the courage to demand it." Maybe I should ask the Government whether decisions seal their legislative bodies where popular power resides can be revoked at the behest of anti . If so is obvious that English democracy is still limping.
Two in three people believe that this politicized Justice English, but not shocked because the judges have ideas or preferences policies, but because act slogans to the dictates of partisan and sectarian external, coming from place of origin.
The main collateral damage are causing this murky, surprising and unpleasant issues are the further deterioration of the image of Justice, including abroad, and in itself enough battered. This is what happens to the Policy when some political reaches into the box. Surely this
opinion is not POLITICALLY CORRECT, it may doubt if it is correct or appropriate, but as we agree on is that it is free. That for that work with democracy. Take care
0 comments:
Post a Comment