From the left to access public life to transform society, to improve living conditions citizenship, to let you do your best to benefit others, to work honestly and selflessly for your ideals, for so many things, but as long as this is a sign of ideological identity, with the whole society. With everyone. Those who will vote and those who do not. Because when you choose, president of government or council, we choose to govern for all.
Perhaps it makes sense to see that no attachment that takes the elected official. Why so hard to understand that if you want or can not meet these principles there is no choice but to step aside and leave others. Surely it would not be acting so constantly need to challenge term limits.
I think in our country there were reasons enough for Rodriguez Zapatero has done the right thing by announcing his non-attendance at the next election. Or perhaps it is not right:
1 .- To have a rating level of 3.3 by the public.
2 .- almost 70% disapprove of your management. That 81% did not have confidence in you.
3 .- Having the worst score in the history of a president. Neither Aznar at the time of the Iraq war had a very low valuation of the public.
4 .- Passing of equal opportunities for ideologically indistinguishable from the right on the economy.
5 .- To have lost the battle between government and markets.
6 .- Not being able to change ever more hopeless diagnosis obtained by the public. 9 out of 10 English considered bad economic situation and more than 4 million unemployed in the country.
7 .- Have become the problem not the solution
8 .- To have lost the enormous capital of confidence with which he arrived, turning this into an icon of bewilderment.
9 .- Maintain a speech so confused and imprecise thinking that has made a dedicated staff without collective ideas.
10 .- have devalued both the brand that has disarmed the PSOE until he reached the lowest voting intentions of the story. 24.3%. (The country 12/05/2010)
also had to leave for other reasons.
.- Be consistent with your idea of \u200b\u200bno more than two terms.
.- Be consistent with the ideology of sacrifice for the country over his person, even the partisan interest.
.- In order not to discredit a magnificent legacy to the country as more freedom, more social justice, or better laws for citizens from other bets. Always better to be remembered by the President to urge the law against gender violence, the law of stem cell research, gay marriage law, the law on abortion, the dependency of penalty points, anti-smoking ... etc. Laws that has not shared the PP but that would take advantage of them and not play when you rule. To be remembered as the president who went down the drain with the global economic crisis, dragging his party into the fall.
.- Having standardized regional differences in this country. Or is normalized governments have shared in Euskadi and Catalunya Mr. Lopez and Mr. José.Que greater the variety and the difference in this country although some nostalgic remaining committed to what a great and free. Let me guess what an excursus Aznar to Zapatero said in the transferring of power in Moncloa in 2004? "Do not worry much in this country are those who rule the autonomous communities, you have almost no powers." What do you think I spend an evening with the song speaks Castilian Pujol dwarf the next morning to speak Catalan in private.
But above all, a powerful razón.Haber laid bare the Partido Popular.Se ambiguity just as you, not to give anything to not scare the votes of upsetting, and mobilize center or left. To say nothing and pretend that something is said. Having sole speech Zapatero go away, and thus not having to explain it is that the co-payment of social security, although some escape them, as advocate for transparency by having the same candidates in Valencia, or which are measures People save when their city's landmark, Madrid, has three times more debt than the Netherlands.
I said they are concerned with the Genoa street because they think they have run out of enemy and also this has become a patriotic martyr who sacrifices himself for Spain. Even the martyrs of Spain Zapatero takes away. ! About the limit!. What I mean is if the politician who goes on a voluntary basis by the mere fact it gain in public appreciation is seen much more sympathy and respect.
Let us not forget that the degree of appreciation of Mr. Rajoy is similar to the ZP and that if the PP exercise internal democracy, this is what citizens value most of the parties, it would surely Rajoy chosen by its members.
In other words in the PP were convinced that between Zapatero and Rajoy, but none like, win Rajoy. They now have a dilemma: between Rajoy and other socialist candidate or another what will happen? This concern will be for the media to attack Rubalcaba? It will be for this reason the effort in early elections now to restore the fast-track Moncloa, will not be that Ms. Chacón defeat Rajoy?
assumption that the wear huge shift has taken place in the world, certainly led and captained by colleagues PP, which does not save any current leader of the democratic world is the policy option it has been an honorable gesture of President Zapatero to his party and its ideology. This crisis is not the ride While neither Merkel nor Obama, or anyone who has touched.
I think this lesson only democratic president who has not lost any election, will, as I read in some way, that Zapatero Suarez beat the record regarding the speed with which a political leader happens to suffer the greatest the slights to get the best of collective recognition.
This will be his last major victory and his best for the Socialist Party and its ideology .
time to time.
Take care
0 comments:
Post a Comment